Page 17 of 60 FirstFirst ... 713141516171819202127 ... LastLast
Results 161 to 170 of 593

Thread: LGBTQ! Why so many anti gay slurs? NSFW/K

  1. #161
    Devilish Member Slurpee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    668
    Wow.....
    I have hope now, I thought it would take at least two years for the changes to be obvious on someone. I actually seriously planed to hold on college for a whole year because I didn't want to go in looking feminine.

  2. #162
    Super Senior Member Delphinus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    2,301
    Interesting thing I found for other homo/bisexual people: the concept of sexual orientation is actually fairly new. The ancient Greeks didn't have it, for example, and the ancient Romans only seem to have acquired it once they became Christian. Sexual orientation is a socialised concept, not a biological one, which makes the claims of certain conservatives ("IT'S NOT NATURAL") look really stupid.
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenn
    You forgot your F in Modesty.

  3. #163
    Regular Member Lucy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    222
    Quote Originally Posted by Delphinus View Post
    Interesting thing I found for other homo/bisexual people: the concept of sexual orientation is actually fairly new. The ancient Greeks didn't have it, for example, and the ancient Romans only seem to have acquired it once they became Christian. Sexual orientation is a socialised concept, not a biological one, which makes the claims of certain conservatives ("IT'S NOT NATURAL") look really stupid.
    I like to use the fact that 1,500+ species, from primates to gutworms, engage in homosexual behavior against those people. Mother Nature says hi.

  4. #164
    Palindrome Member ClockHand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    4,789
    Delp@ I found amassing that you discover that so late in life (jk).

    Yeah, sexual orientation is a social construction, even the relationship between sex is a social construction. So its invented and it can be changed.

  5. #165
    Devilish Member Slurpee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    668
    o_o
    Yknow on the news they keep talking about how Kobe Bryant made a "gay slur".
    I can't tell if they really care or they just want to talk about Kobe Bryant.

  6. #166
    Moderator Psy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    I call it many names. The two that seem to be most accurate tho are "Hell" and "Work".
    Posts
    1,330
    I really hate how in the media and with younger generations you allways see and hear people say "I dont want to be labeled like that" (So hipster). Like saying that you are Gay Lesbian or Bisexual is some kind of death sentence. People use names like insults without even realizing what they are saying. Saying some one is Gay now is like saying that person is stupid or dumb "Dude you're so gay" "Dude thats so gay" when nothing they are doing or saying is actually refrencing somthing homosexual. The same goes for fag but that steps it up a notch and goes from calling them stupid to calling them some one who enjoys sex with another man. So now Gay means stupid and Fag means Gay/Homosexual.

    My sisters teacher called a gay student a fag witout realizing he was gay. The guy (and unfortuanatley my sister) dresses in the emo fashion including skinny jeans and the teacher said "Why do young guys like you dress like that with skinny jeans and stuff? It makes you all look like fags." the guy made a fuss about this stating "Dont you think thats really insulting to actual gay students like me?" and refused to let the subject stop and was suspended by the teacher. Nothing was done to the teacher except he was made to appologize to the guy (and subsequently had to come out to his mom) and the suspension was lifted.
    People use these words like the smurfs and think it totally natural to do so. No one questions it. No one corrects them (Seriously where is a grammar nazi when you need one?). No one even seems to care or pay attenion to it in the slightest and that is really sad. I guess i am jaded and feel the need to correct people on the subject because it hits so close to home but i would and do correct people on other subjects that i know about. I had an argument with my aunts friend on myspace when she told my aunt to "become a lesbian" and told her "you dont become a lesbian you either are or you arent" which she responded with "I never said to become a lesbian i said it was an option" and it was just stupid but comes back to my point about people not thinking about what they are really saying and who they are insulting with these words.

  7. #167
    Palindrome Member ClockHand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    4,789
    I prefer other words, like:
    "Saco Huea": I use it for any person who drives sport cars, think he/she is cool, talk about sport or parties, and all those things.
    "Tontaku" or "Dumbtaku": Any nerd who only knows like naruto and would love to live in japan.
    "Ahuevonado": Stupid.

    Gay, Fag, Puta, Puto, Bitch, Zorra, etcetera are for kids or inmature people, who still believe that those are insults. There is people who would punch you in the face if you call them gay, but I prefer to be punched in the face saying a real insult, like "Hey, you should tell your mom to stop fucking the first guy she see" (the punch in the face feels way better when this is true jejeje).

  8. #168
    Bad Enough Dude to Rescue the President Kodos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    2,813
    Quote Originally Posted by Lucy View Post
    I like to use the fact that 1,500+ species, from primates to gutworms, engage in homosexual behavior against those people. Mother Nature says hi.
    I find the argument from nature worthless. You know what's really fucking unnatural? Living much past 30.

    That said, while other animals engage in homosexual behavior, I do think that you can make the argument it's 'unnatural' or at least 'abnormal' not that any of these words should have any sort of moral condemnation implicit in them. Strictly speaking the purpose of an organism is to make copies of its DNA. Humans and other sexually reproducing creatures do this by fucking and then making an entirely new animal that carries on this process. Strict homosexuality is an evolutionary death sentence for the individual concerned, since they are obviously not going to contribute to the gene pool.

    I've always found the biology of sex fascinating, and it's a shame there's not more research done on it. On the other hand, if we ever conclusively identified what sort genes might be responsible for homosexuality I am sure that abortions would occur en masse, and it would just become another tool for persecution, so I suppose it's for the best.

    Do you like big boobs? Dragons? Ninja? Martial arts? Wizards? Then click here and make all your wildest dreams come true!!

  9. #169
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    44
    Quote Originally Posted by ClockHand View Post
    For some reason this gets me upset. Why not just look masculine. I might be jealous cause they almost look as feminime as me afterwards. Must, retain, pretty femninime Thai looks. Think I am just jealous, maybe I should take some. I'll probably look weird though.

  10. #170
    Devilish Member Slurpee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    668
    I heard that Nicky Arguz's case is going to court May 13th.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •