-
Sir-Mass-a-Lot
But it's most realistic in a combat setting, especially when we're talking about mass production for, say, a very powerful security force.
-
Palindrome Member
Realistic? What do you mean?
I think continuous tracks are the most efficient mechanism for movements. And with a rotative canon you have the most efficient weapon for combat and warfare.
-
Sir-Mass-a-Lot
Oh oh tracks you know I thought you were talking about pressurized air mobility and that is expensive
-
Palindrome Member
What? No.
I'm just saying that continuous tracks are the best mechanism for movement, and that bipedal, quadrupedal or any mechanism that us legs is downgrading technology. Like the best that quadrupedal movement can do it would be to go up stairs, but ones you are developing the technology for that you can make continuous tracks to be able to do that too.
-
Sir-Mass-a-Lot
-
Ruler of the Seventh Empire
Tracks is your best bet for reliable mobility, especially over rough terrain. Now if you can figure out how to make something that has the flexibility and sense of a human or any highly agile creature, then there's a bit of a game changer. Otherwise you're gonna end up with C3PO shit.
-
Ying Yang Member
building a huge robot would not be wise specially the amount of metal you will use to build one... unless you are fighting a huge alien. lol
-
Sir-Mass-a-Lot
Um not true at all. We build tanks and fighters, right? That takes a lot of metal.
-
Ying Yang Member
i mean building a life size gundam...
-
Palindrome Member
I think materials are the least problem.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks