^ I'm gonna go see him with my girlfriend on the 5th.
![]()
^ I'm gonna go see him with my girlfriend on the 5th.
![]()
Originally Posted by Fenn
^ Its the YMCA. Jesus is the Y. And the guy in the middle needs to lay off the corndogs.
Corndogs are awesome, man. It's about the only thing the American south does right.
Found this and felt like sharing.
Time to stimulate discussion:
Is the belief in the existence of a non-Abrahamic deity logically comprehensible? Are there objections that can be raised to it beyond 'no evidence' (which is not absolute proof of non-existence)? If not, are there arguments to be made for natural law, such as fate?
Originally Posted by Fenn
Depends on the non-Abrahamic deity. What deity? Also considering that these deities are supposedly active in the mortal world, the lack of compelling evidence for their existence across the entirety of human history is evidence against their existence.
^ Any deity. I can see how the Greek gods and things like Cthulhu or a deistic god could potentially exist, despite lack of evidence.
Also: Cross-posting this both in science thread and here.
Originally Posted by Fenn
Bookmarks